Pedestrian Hit By Car: $780K Settlement

Personal Injury Case Study

Pedestrian Hit By Car: $780,000 Settlement

This is a personal injury case study of a pediestrian who was hit by a car. Our client, Mimi Tapp* an elderly lady was hit by the driver of a car while she crossed a downtown street on her way to attend a church service on a Sunday morning. It was an unfortunate set of circumstances that brought together a male driver in his 80’s (Mr Davies* ) and a female pedestrian (Mimi) in her 80’s into a serious accident on a clear sunny day in late fall of 2014. The impact of the car hitting Mimi resulted in her suffering extensive physical injuries including physiological damage to her brain.

This case study uses information from the client`s settlement brief and supporting documentation.


Our facts were drawn from a compilation of an independent witness statement combined with the investigation done by Niagara Regional Police Services which was summarized in their accident reconstruction report.

The asphalt roadway on the street where the accident occurred was in a good state of repair, level and straight. All roads were dry and clear and lighting was not a factor. it was a quiet Sunday morning with little traffic.

Our client was walking to her church for Sunday service. Standing across the street from the location of the church, she then crossed the street towards the church. At this same time, Mr Davies was on route to the St. Catharines General Hospital to visit his wife who was hospitalized there. He was familiar with the area and indeed his wife had been hospitalized for a number of days and her husband came to visit her daily, using this same general route to travel.

Mimi began to cross the street when she was struck by Mr Davies just as Mimi crossed the centre line on the two-way street. Mr Davies car collided with Mimi’s purse with his driver’s side mirror, sending the purse flying and then striking her body with his front left fender. Mimi came to rest on the roadway on her back with her head facing in a southerly direction with her right arm behind her back. Her boots and blue coat and white sweater were scattered on the yellow centre line of the street.


A witness to the accident, James Taylor, was standing at the front door, located beside the front window of the church. He was acting as an usher and was opening doors for church members coming into the service that Sunday morning. He was positioned at the two front glass entrance doors to the church, looking through those windowed doors, straight onto the roadway where the accident took place. He saw Mimi walk across the street heading towards where he was standing. He observed her cross to the centre of the street, close to the yellow line, then somewhat into the lane closest to the church, that is, somewhat more than just over halfway across the street, when a car proceeding “in the lane closest to the church” drove by, hitting Mimi and sending her purse flying. Traffic was not busy at the time and the motorist was not travelling quickly. James did not hear the squeal of brakes applied by the driver, and could not understand why the driver didn’t see her on the roadway

Mr Davies did not give a formal statement in writing to the police but is recorded as asserting at the time that he simply never saw her; in the centre of the road. Unless the driver can show why he is NOT liable for hitting a pedestrian, the pedestrian wins liability under the reverse onus provisions of s. 193(3) of the Highway Traffic Act even though the police did not charge the driver. It was noted that he wore corrective glasses for driving.

The police did not charge Mr Davies with a traffic violation, and sadly, he passed away before he could be examined for discovery.


Mimi incurred brain injury as well as extensive orthopaedic fractures to her:
1. left knee (left distal metaphyseal femoral fracture with plate and screw fixation),
2. right upper arm (right fracture mid-humeral diaphyseal fracture surgically repaired by O.R.I.F.),
3. bilateral rib fractures with an associated small right-sided pneumothorax,
4. bilateral sacral fractures,
5. multiple pelvic fractures (comminuted left superior and inferior pubic rami fractures extending into the left symphysis pubis),
6. right occipital condyle (neck), and
7. C7 transverse process fracture (neck)

After the accident, she went from complete independence at the time of the accident to complete dependence on others for her care.


This personal injury case was opened in 2014 and Ashley Gnyś successfully settled Mimi’s personal injury claim in February 2018, providing Mimi with the financial compensation she deserved and needed in her life. The tort claim settlement was for $280,000 and the accident benefits claim settlement was $500,000 for a combined settlement of $780,000.

*Names have been fictionalized to protect the privacy of our clients and other parties.

Disclaimer – This personal injury case has been selected to show the variance of processes and the nature of compensation claims that we deal with. They do not reflect what happens in every circumstance nor what may happen with other legal providers. We have used our experiences to outline likely scenarios that may occur when making a claim. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results.”